Note that Facebook's becoming a publicly traded company has no effect on privacy rights of users, as explained in this Snopes article (posted on Facebook itself by a Friend this morning), link.
Monday, June 04, 2012
Facebook "likes" can propagate a person's image on line -- a "publicity" as well as a "privacy" issue?
An article Friday, June 1 by Somini Sengupta in the New York
Times (front page), “So much for sharing his ‘like’”, develops an issue that could eventually lead
to legal rethinking of concepts like “right of publicity” as well as
privacy -- as the use of people’s photos
becomes even more unpredictable on the Internet. The link for the story is (website url) here.
The specifics concern the whimsical Facebook “like” by one
Nick Bergus for a facetious product (a 55-gallon barrel of personal lubricant,
something you wouldn’t “take delivery of” as a “future” – the old pork belly
idea). His image wound up on an
automated ad paid for by Amazon.
Apparently the “like” is treated as an endorsement (one of the
components of publicity law), at least in part as buried in Facebook’s TOS.
This wouldn’t affect me now, but it might if my family
situation were more sensitive (as it was well before Mother died), or if I were
already making money out of fame from my books (no, I’m not making money out of
it now – more on that issue later – it get calls from the “publisher” over
this).
Note that Facebook's becoming a publicly traded company has no effect on privacy rights of users, as explained in this Snopes article (posted on Facebook itself by a Friend this morning), link.
Note that Facebook's becoming a publicly traded company has no effect on privacy rights of users, as explained in this Snopes article (posted on Facebook itself by a Friend this morning), link.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment